new contractor status
Moderators: Moleman, Kwijibo, Luna
- feenix
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:17 pm
- Location: Join the SGE community in TeamSpeak, url: ygss.dyndns.org
- Contact:
new contractor status
ok i think we should have a new contractor status system..
what my idea is, is when for example when 2 corps (or more) are allied, then the ceo can cs with the other corp ceo and this would be the same has the current cs system except only a ceo can cancel this cs. and the 2 corp could land on each others cols and allow them to fight each other but also prevent a corper from a allied corp to invade one another.
the reason why i bring this up is because i am allied with the current top corp (united) and even tho i am csed to them, a player which is in that corp was able to invade me as if the cs wasn't there, the reason why i believe this happened is because the cs only affects the plp csed and not the whole corp, which is why i think we need another one which only th ceo would do and it would affect everyone in the corp
the upside: no accidental of invasion on friends.
the downside: only a ceo can create this and cancel this
balanced enough?
what my idea is, is when for example when 2 corps (or more) are allied, then the ceo can cs with the other corp ceo and this would be the same has the current cs system except only a ceo can cancel this cs. and the 2 corp could land on each others cols and allow them to fight each other but also prevent a corper from a allied corp to invade one another.
the reason why i bring this up is because i am allied with the current top corp (united) and even tho i am csed to them, a player which is in that corp was able to invade me as if the cs wasn't there, the reason why i believe this happened is because the cs only affects the plp csed and not the whole corp, which is why i think we need another one which only th ceo would do and it would affect everyone in the corp
the upside: no accidental of invasion on friends.
the downside: only a ceo can create this and cancel this
balanced enough?
- Cheesy
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:40 am
- Location: Classified (hiding from the aliens)
- Contact:
Re: new contractor status
this is the way it should be, theres too many glitches in the current systemfeenix wrote:ok i think we should have a new contractor status system..
what my idea is, is when for example when 2 corps (or more) are allied, then the ceo can cs with the other corp ceo and this would be the same has the current cs system except only a ceo can cancel this cs. and the 2 corp could land on each others cols and allow them to fight each other but also prevent a corper from a allied corp to invade one another.
the reason why i bring this up is because i am allied with the current top corp (united) and even tho i am csed to them, a player which is in that corp was able to invade me as if the cs wasn't there, the reason why i believe this happened is because the cs only affects the plp csed and not the whole corp, which is why i think we need another one which only th ceo would do and it would affect everyone in the corp
the upside: no accidental of invasion on friends.
the downside: only a ceo can create this and cancel this
balanced enough?
i too AGREE with this post and am bumping it ...theres to much individualism in contracts.. make it hard for ceo's to maintain order ..contracts should be discussed as a corp and made by ceo's ..mabye 2 contracts per corp or somthing..but from ceo to ceo
it took me 3 days to contract to a corp we are subcontracting to and neither of us could figure out why ..finally we just wiped all our contracts and started anew or started fresh ..clean slate
it took me 3 days to contract to a corp we are subcontracting to and neither of us could figure out why ..finally we just wiped all our contracts and started anew or started fresh ..clean slate
- tekkamanblade
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:51 am
- Location: preaching on a street corner near you
we don't have enough players per server to fill two full corps anyway, so what does it matter?MastrIan wrote:So you are suggesting that there be a way to ally corporations together. The current system is for individuals more or less, and not a corp-wide thing.
Personally I am not a fan of this idea as it would further negate the purpose of corp size limits.
_____________________
Thorin | Save The Rebangs
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:31 am
Code: Select all
/**
@param Name of corporation receiving/losing the contract
@param Name of corporation giving/taking the contract
@param If true removes any current contracts w/ that corp, if false adds corp wide contract
@return Did it work?
**/
public boolean contractCorp(String contractee, String contractor, boolean removeContract) {
if(removeContract) {
contractee.removeCorpContract(contractor);
if(contractee.getCorpContracts.contains(contractor)) {
return false;
}
else {
return true;
}
}
else {
contractee.addCorpContract(contracter);
if(contractee.getCorpContracts.contains(contractor)) {
return true;
}
else {
return false;
}
}
}
(this is a yes, do it! btw)
(this is also an "this would only take a few minutes to do so do it" nudge to Toonces)